Let's say there is a guy who is like James Bond -- he lives a life full of adventure, is capable of doing just about any amazing feat, is ruggedly handsome, and can leap across building in a single bound...BUT his personality is dull, unexpressive, and boring.
Then there is another guy who is outgoing, animated, witty, full of funny jokes, engaging stories, and can make anybody be his friend. BUT he has zero practical know-how or ability. He couldn't even change the tire on your car if his life depended on it.
Basically, the first guy is a do'er and the second guy is a talker. Which guy would you prefer and why? And you can't say a combination of both. You have to pick one or the other. Which is more important?Ladies, what trait is more important in a man -- social suave or technical/physical aptitude?The latter.
Physical prowess fades a lot faster than an excellent personality. I don't care if a guy is incapable of changing a tire or lifting heavy things, all I want is someone I can talk to and have fun with.
Example; my current boyfriend. Not ruggedly handsome, lives a boring indoor life, certainly not the buff-nut model of a man. However, he is a really nice guy, he's funny, and he's incredibly intelligent. I love him to pieces.Ladies, what trait is more important in a man -- social suave or technical/physical aptitude?I would say Stop breaking your head over these bad catches. There are a lot more fish in the sea.: )Ladies, what trait is more important in a man -- social suave or technical/physical aptitude?The doer. He can talk when inspired in just the right way. Honestly, the poll won't get you anywhere. Everybody has a different %26quot;On button%26quot;. Sometimes a lady turns on her %26quot;On button%26quot; and channels a man's. THAT is the key
.Ladies, what trait is more important in a man -- social suave or technical/physical aptitude?Sorry. . .flawed question. . .for me anyway. I don't see how a James Bond type can be boring. He might be a pompous idiot but never boring. And there are lots of great guys who just don't fix things. But for the sake of your question and since I can fix most things or I can pay to have them fixed, I'll take the guy that I enjoy being with. . .so not the boring guy. . .ever.Ladies, what trait is more important in a man -- social suave or technical/physical aptitude?Depends on a girls personal needs and wants. If she likes adventure and beauty in a man and is willing to sacrifice a tire change for humor and engaging stories. Then her most important trait would be the social suave to dream with. While on the other hand if a girls personal needs are more perfectly met by substance over style and being bored with a dull inexpressive man to live and dream with.I guess then her most important trait would be the guy with the practical know how.what ever your choice girl friend, just remember what you see in this case is what you get, and no matter how much you try you will never change either one of these traits. So whatever your fancy; you are right when you say, %26quot; you can't say a combination of both%26quot;, because there will not ever be a combination of both with the two traits that you are questioning. Very seldom can you partake in the cake and frosting too in this type of scenario.Ladies, what trait is more important in a man -- social suave or technical/physical aptitude?I prefer guy 1. I find men who can do practical things very attractive. And I don't believe a man who can do all that kind of stuff is boring. I had a bloke who was like no.2 once, but he was a right bastard. Animated and witty and engaging, but he had a very cruel streak too. I don't want another one like that.
